« Visite cantonale à Méréville | Accueil | Hommage aux victimes du crash de l'A310 »

30 juin 2009

Commentaires

[121] stu,no problema. This does rile me bacuese it is done a lot more often than people think, and it isn't reported in MSM. Also, I see a very clear slant that makes pretty clear that what are considered dangerous conditions have a political component, and that equally dangerous conditions are ignored if they are common in the politically acceptable segments of society.Right now, that doesn't fry my onions as I am not so outside the mainstream that I will attract the attention of the authorities.But, as an example, you can easily see that a left wing state a.g. (like Milgram) can determine (as some on the left have pushed) that gun ownership presents a danger to children. Because they can't seize the guns, they seize the kids. And how about SUV ownership? After all, they can roll over. As you can see, this doctrine is ripe for abuse, and it is abused regularly in my opinion.

L'utilisation des commentaires est désactivée pour cette note.